* main:
refactor: use slices package for sorting (#10136)
build: handle multiple general release notes
build: no need to build on the branches that just trigger tags
* main:
build: use specific token for pushing release tags
fix(gui): update `uncamel()` to handle strings like 'IDs' (fixes#10128) (#10131)
refactor: use slices package for sort (#10132)
build: process for automatic release tags (#10133)
chore(gui, man, authors): update docs, translations, and contributors
* main:
fix(strelaysrv): make the session limiter session-dependent (fixes#10072) (#10073)
build: artifact uploads destination OCI
chore(gui, man, authors): update docs, translations, and contributors
chore(gui): use go list --deps for dependency list (#10071)
* main:
fix(gui): fix previous commit
fix(gui): mark unseen disconnected devices as inactive (#10048)
fix(strings): differentiate setup(n) and set(v) up (#10024)
chore(fs): changes to allow Filesystem to be implemented externally (#10040)
chore(config): resolve primary STUN servers via SRV record (fixes#10029) (#10031)
build: push artifacts to Azure (#10044)
chore(gui, man, authors): update docs, translations, and contributors
Switch the database from LevelDB to SQLite, for greater stability and
simpler code.
Co-authored-by: Tommy van der Vorst <tommy@pixelspark.nl>
Co-authored-by: bt90 <btom1990@googlemail.com>
This allows users to easily disable nightly builds in their forks,
simply by disabling the
build-nightly action.
### Testing
I tested it in my fork, and it works.
The requirements for Windows code signing changed in 2023, so that newly
generated certificates can only be stored in hardware modules. Luckily,
I managed to snag a three year certificate before that so it hasn't
affected us so much. Now though, it does, because our cert is expiring
in March.
This changes the code signing process for Windows to use a cloud
service, Azure Trusted Signing. This appears to work equally well and
outsources the problem entirely, while also being cheaper than the
actual certificate was to begin with. 🤷
The signing entity will be Kastelo AB and not the Syncthing Foundation,
because the latter is almost impossible to get a certificate for as it's
not a normal corporate entity whose existence can be verified, etc. This
is also how it was prior to the latest certificate; it's not ideal, but
I think it's acceptable under the circumstances.
The GitHub checkout action does weird stuff with tags which breaks `git
describe`. This works around that so we get proper release builds on tag
pushes.
This codifies a review policy which is closer to what I always
envisioned, but which isn't expressible using the normal checks in the
GitHub GUI. It would move the commit approval check from GitHub into the
policy-bot check which is already present to enforce the
conventional-commits standard. Approvals in general would still work the
same -- it's just that the bot picks it up and toggles the status
accordingly. From a GitHub side when this is enabled we'd remove the
requires-review check from there and let the bot decide that part. We
would still require builds and tests to pass of course.
There are a couple of relexations from the current policy, details in
the code but briefly:
- Changes to translations or dependencies by a trusted person don't
require review
- Trivial changes by a trusted person, explicitly marked as such, don't
require review
This enables less bureaucracy for things like adding new translated
languages and updating dependencies, and enables the trivial-change
workflow to a larger audience than, like, me, who could always just
bypass the rules by way of being admin.
Move infrastructure related commands to under `cmd/infra` and
development stuff to `cmd/dev`. The default build command builds the
regular user facing binaries: syncthing, stdiscosrv, and strelaysrv.
This is to add the generation of `compat.json` as a release artifact. It
describes the runtime requirements of the release in question. The next
step is to have the upgrade server use this information to filter
releases provided to clients. This is per the discussion in #9656
---------
Co-authored-by: Ross Smith II <ross@smithii.com>
Jakob Borg
Ross Smith II